|

KUNDALINI
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
AND SELECTED REFERENCES
Version
2.0, January 1996
Copyright Kurt Keutzer, 1996 (keutzer@synopsys.com)
The author grants the right to
copy and distribute this file, provided it remains unmodified and original authorship
and copyright is retained. Adding tasteful artwork is encouraged. Please do not
change the title of this document. The author retains both the right and intention
to modify and extend this document.
This FAQ gives a background on
the phenomenon of kundalini and is assumed material before reading the other related
articles:
Siddha Mahayoga FAQ
Kundalini Yogas FAQ
The Siddha Mahayoga Tradition of Swami Shivom Tirth
I bow to
the vibrant source of my innermost bliss.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS:
What is kundalini?
What is the difference between prana and kundalini? What is the difference between
qi (or chi) and kundalini?
If kundalini is universal why do some kundalini yogins seem to have more kundalini-energy
than others ?
What does kundalini have to do with spiritual enlightenment? What is the goal of
kundalini yoga?
Does everyone agree that kundalini awakening is necessary for enlightenment?
Can I just use kundalini yoga simply to improve my health?
Is there any scientific basis for kundalini and the cakras? Do I really have to
believe that all these cakras physically exist?
Is Chinese qi gong a kind of kundalini yoga?
What about Tibetan Buddhism - has kundalini been known in Tibet?
Are there any other traditions that show awareness of kundalini?
So how do I awaken kundalini?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using effort to awaken kundalini?
What are the signs of an awakened kundalini?
Are these methods of awakening kundalini dangerous? What about Gopi Krishna's books?
But even if kundalini is dangerous, isn't it a faster way to enlighenment?
There have been many scandals among kundalini yoga teachers - particularly sexual
scandals. Is there a correlation between sexual scandals and kundalini yoga practice?
If my kundalini is awakened will I need to change my lifestyle? Do I need to be
celibate?
Where can I learn more?
What
is kundalini?
``Kundalini'' literally means
coiling, like a snake. In the classical literature of hatha yoga kundalini is described
as a coiled serpent at the base of the spine. The image of coiling, like a spring,
conveys the sense of untapped potential energy. Perhaps more meaningfully kundalini
can be described as a great reservoir of creative energy at the base of the spine.
It's not useful to sit with our consciousness fixed in our head and think of kundalini
as a foreign force running up and down our spine. Unfortunately the serpent image
may serve to accentuate this alien nature of the image. It's more useful to think
of kundalini energy as the very foundation of our consciousness so that when kundalini
moves through our bodies our consciousness necessarily changes with it.
The concept of kundalini can also be examined from a strictly psychological perspective.
From this perspective kundalini can be thought of as a rich source of psychic or
libidinous energy in our unconscious.
In the classical literature of Kashmir Shaivism kundalini is described in three
different manifestions. The first of these is as the universal energy or para-kundalini.
The second of these is as the energizing function of the body-mind complex or prana-kundalini.
The third of these is as consciousness or shakti-kundalini which simultaneously
subsumes and intermediates between these two. Ultimately these three forms are the
same but understanding these three different forms will help to understand the differerent
manifestations of kundalini.
What
is the difference between prana and kundalini? What is the difference between qi
(or chi) and kundalini?
First let us try to relate to
concepts from the same tradition - prana and kundalini. Prana has been translated
as the ``vital breath'' and ``bio-energetic motility''; it is associated with maintaining
the functioning of the mind and body. Kundalini, in its form as prana-kundalini,
is identical to prana ; however, Kundalini also has a manifestations as consciousness
and a as a unifying cosmic energy. One could ascribe these same aspects to prana
as well so past a certain point these become distinctions without differences.
From the subjective standpoint of an individual actually experiencing the awakening
of kundalini I have found three completely different opinions:
The first opinion is that a pranic awakening is only a prelude to a full kundalini
awakening. Tibetan yogins that I have encountered consider the activation of prana
(Tibetan: rlung) as merely a prerequisite for the activation of kundalini (Tibetan:
gTummo). What's attractive about this viewpoint is that it explains the difference
between the experience of simply having pleasant sensations in the spine and the
much more powerful experience of having a ``freight-train''-like full kundalini
experience.
The second opinion, espoused by Swami Shivom Tirth for example, is that prana and
kundalini are absolutely equivalent and that it is not meaningful in any way to
describe a difference between kundalini rising and prana rising. When posed with
question as to how to distinguish between pleasant sensations that show some pranic-activity
in the spine and the much more powerful experience Swami Shivom Tirth said that
the difference is not in the nature of the activity but in the consciousness that
observes it. If the consciousness that experiences the pranic activity is seated
within the spine (or more correctly, the central channel, known as the sushumna),
then the experience is felt much more powerfully.
The third opinion, espoused by the modern hatha yogin, Desikaran, is that pranic
awakening is the true experience to be aimed for and kundalini is actually an obstruction.
Desikaran sees the kundalini as a block in the central channel and thus the kundalini
must be ``killed'' to make way for the prana. This is the most unusual view of the
three.
The Chinese concept of qi (or chi) can be safely identified with the Indian concept
of prana.
If all this seems confusing - don't worry, you're in good company. My conclusion
is that these are all different terminologies for dealing with a common set of experiences.
Any one of these viewpoints is adequate for describing the full range of experiences.
What is probably more relevant is to distinguish two different experiences which
are often confused. In one an individual experiences some pleasant energizing electric
energy running along the spine. This experience itself brings about a wide range
of experiences and results in vitality and sensitivity.
Another very distinct experience is the experience of kundalini entering the sushumna
and rising up the spine. As soon as kundalini enters the sushumna this experience
will completely overwhelm ordinary waking consciousness. From the moment that kundalini
enters the sushumna there will no longer be a distrinction between the subjective
consciousness which experiences and the object of experience. This experience much
more profoundly transfigures consciousness.
If
kundalini is universal, why do some kundalini yogins seem to have more kundalini-energy
than others?
It's an intriguing question. If
an individual's kundalini is viewed as simply a personal reservoir of a cosmic energy
then why would one person appear to have more of a reservoir of kundalini energy
than another? Nevertheless, this does appear to be the case. This is probably another
advantage of the viewpoint that prana (or qi) is the same as kundalini.
Some Chinese texts distinguish between ``innate qi'' or ``pre-natal qi'' that one
is born with and ``cultivated qi'' that can be developed. Clearly some people simply
have more ``innate qi.'' This manifests as a stronger more resilient body and greater
general vitality.
Through training those that have relatively weak ``innate qi'' may surpass those
who have strong ``innate qi'' but do not train. There are many stories in the Chinese
literature of Qi Gong about people who took up Qi Gong in order to improve their
poor health became powerful martial artists or great qi gong masters. Of course
those that have strong ``innate qi'' and also train their qi may develop the strongest
qi of all.
What
does kundalini have to do with spiritual enlightenment? What is the goal of kundalini
yoga?
First we need a few concepts:
In yogic anatomy the sushumna is the central channel and conduit for the kundalini
energy that runs along our spine and up to the crown of our head. Along this channel
are placed additional channel networks called cakras. These cakras are associated
with major aspects of our anatomy - for example our throat, heart, solar plexus,
and in turn these aspects of our anatomy are related to aspects of our human nature.
According to the literature of kundalini yoga our experience of these centers is
limited due to knots which restrict the flow of energy into these centers. Three
knots are particuarly important. The knot of Brahma which restricts the center at
the base of the spine. The knot of Vishnu which restricts the heart center and the
knot of Rudra which restricts the center between the eyebrows. These knots form
an important framework in yogic thinking and the stages toward enlightenment are
articulated in terms of breaking through these knots in the yogic classic the Hatha
Yoga Pradipika as well as in some of the yoga upanishads. Specifically, four stages
of progress are described:
arambha
|
ghata
|
parichaya
|
nishpatti
|
Arambha is associated with breaking
the knot of Brahma and the awakening of kundalini.
Ghata is associated with breaking the knot of Vishnu and and with internal absorption.
Parichaya the absorption deepens and in
nishpatti the knot of Rudra is pierced and the kundalini may ascend to the center
at the crown of the head. In this state transcendence is integrated and, according
to the yogic liteature, the yogi has nothing more to attain.
Putting these elaborate physiological decriptions aside, the goal of kundalini yoga
is the same as the goal of any legimitate spiritual practice: To be liberated from
the limited bounds of the self-centered and alienated ego. In kundalini yoga this
is associated with internal manifestations of the kundalini but the external manifestations
should be similar to any other legitiimate spiritual practice.
So
does everyone agree that kundalini awakening is necessary for enlightenment?
The view that kundalini awakening
is necessary for enlightenment is held in the diverse literature of Kashmir Shaivism
and in other Hindu Tantric literature. It is found in the literature of the Hatha
Yogis and the Nath Sampradaya. You will find similar views in many Buddhist Tantric
works. In addition this view is held by recent spiritual figures such as Shri Ramakrishna,
Swami Sivananda, Paramahamsa Yogananda and Swami Vivekananda and of course by contemporary
kundalini yogins themselves.
Nevertheless there are some dissenters from this view. These include Sri Chinmoy,
Da Free John and Gurdjieff. Dissent can take a number of different forms. For Gurjieff
kundalini is associated only with a binding force that leads us to be more attached
to the world. Such a view of kundalini is not entirely inaccurate but only reflects
the functioning of kundalini in the lower energy centers. For Sri Chinmoy kundalini
is an amplifying function that may make an individual more powerful but not more
enlightened. From my perspective this also only addresses the impact of kundalini
while it operates in the lower energy centers.
Da Free John (born Franklin Jones, a. k. a. Da Love Ananda) has a much more fundamental
criticism of kundalini. As far as I understand his position, for him enlightenment
cannot be the result of an experience; it is a cognitive transformation. Kundalini
may evoke a wide variety of experiences but these are not in and of themselves enlightening.
This is an interesting perspective but it seems to assume that the raising of kundalini
is an experience in which an ego-consciousness experiences a separate object known
as kundalini. Again, this view is consistent with the experience of kundalini in
the lower energy centers in which the ego is detached from the movement of kundalini
and kundalini experiences are precieved as separate from oneself. However, I would
argue that as kundalini rises the ego-consciousness becomes infused in a more fundamental
consciousness of cit-shakti-kundalini and this experience does in fact produce a
fundamental cognitive change.
Finally, there are many other spiritual practices, such as Zen, Vipassana meditation
that consider kundalini irrelevant. Some practitioners or even teachers of these
paths, such as Jiyu Kennet, may have kundalini experiences but generally kundalini
is not a pivotal part of these paths.
Can
I use kundalini yoga simply to improve my health?
Yoga exercises which were traditionally
used to purify the body in preparation for awakening the kundalini can also be used
simply to improve the health. To practice techniques aimed at actively awakening
kundalini with the goal of simply improving your health seems to be a misuse of
these powerful techniques.
There are those that teach kundalini yoga principally emphasizing its benefits on
health without much discussion of the spiritual benefits. This is how hatha yoga
has been taught in the west for some time. The affect of this approach depends on
the attitude of the student. There is certainly nothing wrong with trying to improve
your health but there is a tension between awakening an energy that will ultimately
burn up the ego and trying to shape that energy to simply fulfill an ego-oriented
motive.
Is
there any scientific basis for kundalini and the cakras? Do I really have to believe
that all these cakras physically exist?
Research on kundalini is especially
spotty. There is no compelling work to show that the system represents insights
into actual human anatomy. But it's important to understand that kundalini and its
network of channels and cakras is simply how yogins have chosen to explain their
experience and that yogins from many cultures have arrived at similar, though not
identical, concepts. The true physical mechanisms underlying these experiences may
be very different from those described. Izaak Benthov has proposed a model to explain
kundalini in terms of micro- motion in the brain. In this model experiences are
associated with parts of the body, such as the heart, because the part of the brain
associated with that part of the body is stimulated by micro-vibrations. His model
is treated in ``The Kundalini Experience'' by Sannella referenced below. From a
practical perspective the key thing is our subjective experience and that the roadmap
of these subjective experiences has been mapped out.
Is
Chinese qi gong a kind of kundalini yoga?
If there is any contemporary teaching
that is even more diverse in approach than kundalini yoga it must be qi gong. As
a result it is hard to compare kundalini yoga to qi gong. From my limited exposure
to qi gong it is clear there are many qi gong practices that are identical to kundalini
yoga practices. What is also clear is that may qi gong practitioners have reported
experiences that are identical to those of kundalini yogins. In so far as each of
these practices aims at eliminating blocks to the qi/prana energy then they share
a common ground.
What
about Tibetan Buddhism - has kundalini been known in Tibet?
Kundalini yoga in the Natha Sampradaya
and Vajrayana in Tibetan Buddhism both take their origin from the Mahasiddhas who
were active in India from the 8th century to the 12th century. Kundalini yoga practices
formed the core of the teachings of a number of these Mahasiddhas and are strongly
represented in both Tibetan Buddhist practices and contemporary kundalini yoga practices.
Kundalini yoga was spoken of as ``Candali yoga'' by these Mahasiddhas and became
known as gTummo rnal 'byor in Tibet. Candali yoga was a key practice of the famous
Tibetan yogin Milarepa. The role of kundalini yoga in Tibetan Buddhism is discussed
in more detail in the Kundalini Yogas FAQ.
Are
there any other traditions that show awareness of kundalini?
If you believe that kundalini
is at the basis of spiritual progress then every valid spiritual tradition must
have some awareness of kundalini. Christianity (especially Quakerism and Pentecostalism),
Sufism, Qabalistic mysticism, alchemy and magick all have literature which demonstrates
some awareness of the kundalini process but these traditions are not, to this author's
awareness, so open in their exposition of the techniques and so it is hard to judge
the depth of understanding latent in these traditions. Nevertheless, the imagery
is so unmistakable in these traditions that each must have, at least at one time,
been conversant with the movement of kundalini.
So
how do I awaken kundalini?
Indirectly kundalini can be awakened
by devotion, by selfless service, or by intellectual enquiry. In these paths the
blocks to the awakening of kundalini are slowly removed. Occasionally, individuals
on these paths will experience a sudden awakening of kundalini but generally because
the blocks are slowly and gently removed kundalini-like experiences evolve slowly
in these paths.
Broadly speaking there are two radically different direct approaches to awakening
kundalini. One approach requires initiation by a guru and relies upon a technique
called shaktipat, or ``descent of shakti.'' It is variously called: Siddha Mahayoga,
Kundalini Mahayoga or Sahaja Yoga (Spontaneous Yoga). These approaches are treated
in the Siddha Mahayoga FAQ. The other approach uses intentional yogic techniques
. The styles using intentional techniques include Mantra Yoga, Hatha Yoga, Laya
Yoga or Kriya Yoga. These approaches are treated in the Kundalini Yogas FAQ .
Fundamentally the approach of Siddha Mahayoga and the Kundalini Yogas are different.
In Siddha Mahayoga the guru awakens the kundalini and after that the core of the
practice is the inactive and non-willful surrender to kundalini. In Kundalini Yogas
the will is used to awaken the kundalini and to guide its progress. Clearly these
are different approaches.
Nevertheless, elements of the each approach occur in the practices of the other.
Siddha Mahayogins may use asanas, pranayamas and other hatha yoga practices. On
the other hand gurus in Kundalini Yoga may give infusions of shakti to their students
to help them at particular points in their practice.
What
are the advantages and disadvantages of using effort, in kundalini yogas, as opposed
to the grace of the guru, in siddha mahayoga, to awaken kundalini?
Since every practitioner brings
his own unique inclinations and obstacles to the practice of yoga it is very hard
to generalize on this point. In terms of actually awakening kundalini gurus of Siddha
Mahayoga claim that the kundalini is more easily and reliably awakened by the grace
of the guru than by individual effort. In my limited experience I would agree. with
this assertion. While not every long-term student of either practice necessarily
shows signs of kundalini awakening it is amazing how many people have had instant
awakenings of kundalini through initiation from siddha gurus.
In terms of encountering difficulties along the path the siddha gurus would also
claim that fewer problems due to kundalini awakening, such as mental imbalance,
are encountered by students of Siddha Mahayoga. Here I think the results are mixed.
It seems to me that the guidance of the teacher in either Siddha Mahayoga or Kundalini
Yoga is more a determining factor than which style of kundalini practice is employed.
Generally speaking each style of practice has its strengths and weakness. The strength
of Siddha Mahayoga is the ease with which it awakens the kundalini. The weakness
is that because the kundalini is so easily awakened by the guru students of Siddha
Mahayoga often have completely undisciplined personal meditation practices. Time
is spent instead to trying to recreate some of their initial experiences by following
the guru around hoping for his or her grace Some people spend 20 or more years in
this manner without ever developing an inner core of practice or experience.
The strength of the family of Kundalini Yogas is that the progress is at least apparently
more under the control of the student of the yoga. These students seem more likely
to have disciplined personal practices and more of an understanding of how the practice
relates to their own experience.
Unfortunately for some students this leads to a fairly egotistical approach to their
practice and ultimately the kundalini energy is used to bolster the ego rather than
to merge the ego in bliss.
What
are the signs of an awakened kundalini?
Briefly, according to classical
literature the signs of an awakened kundalini can be grouped into: mental signs,
vocal signs and physical signs. Mental signs can include visions that range from
ecstatically blissful to terrifyingly frightful. Vocal signs can include spontaneous
vocal expressions that range from singing or reciting mantras to make various animals
sounds such as growling or chirping. Physical signs include trembling, shaking and
spontaneously performing hatha yoga postures and pranayamas.
From a more subjective perspective the more pleasant experiences associated with
a kundalini awakening may include: waves of bliss, periods of elation, glimpses
of transcendental consciousness. The less pleasant experiences associated with a
kundalini awakening may include: trembling, sharp aches in areas associated with
the cakras, periods of irrational anxiety, sudden flashes of heat.
Are
these methods of awakening kundalini dangerous? What about Gopi Krishna's books?
If we take the psychological perspective
and view kundalini as the power latent in our unconscious then it is easy to understand
that awakening this force is going to bring a greater amount of unconscious material
into our consciousness. Even in the best of circumstances this is likely to be uncomfortable
and if an individual is barely coping with his unconscious even under normal circumstances
then awakening kundalini may push the individual over into psychosis. This phenomenon
has been documented many times.
Forceful methods of awakening kundalini pose additional dangers. Because quite forceful
methods can be used to awaken kundalini these techniques themselves are potentially
physically and mentally disruptive. An individual named Gopi Krishna awakened his
kundalini by doing unguided meditation on his crown cakra. His life after awakening
was both blessed by ecstatic bliss and tormented by physical and mental discomfort.
Eventually his experience stabilized. He wrote down his experiences in a recently
re-released autbiography entitled ``Living with Kundalini.'' Gopi Krishna's autobiography
appears to be an honest representation of his experiences but it is only one extreme
datapoint in the panorama of experience on kundalini yoga. It represents dangers
in forceful unguided practice but it is not representative of a typical practicioner's
experience.
But
even if kundalini is dangerous, isn't it a faster way to enlighenment?
First of all it may be useful
to observe that there is no technique currently known on earth that appears to be
rapidly catapulting large number of individuals toward enlightenment. Because kundalini
yogas deal so directly with a powerful enlightening force it seems natural that
they would be ``faster'', but there appears to be alot of tortoise and hare phenomena
at work with newbie kundalini yogins. Many people begin kundalini yogas, have strong
initial experiences and then become frightened. Many who perservere through this
initial phase become distracted by the energy and focus on temporal and phenomenal
applications of the energy.
There have been many scandals among kundalini yoga teachers - particularly sexual
scandals. Is there a correlation between sexual scandals and kundalini yoga practice?
There have been scandals regarding the teachers of many paths, both spiritual and
non-spiritual ; however, it is probably fair to say that kundalini yogins have had
more than their share. Since the first publication of these frequently-asked-questions
in 1994 more than one well-known kundalini yoga teacher has been implicated in having
clandestine affairs with students and has been asked to step down from his position
as spiritual leader as a result.
An advanced kundalini yogin is typically a powerful charismatic individual who has
the ability to directly influence the minds of others. Westerners often mistake
this power as a sign of enlightenment and allow such teachers liberties as a result.
In addition it is quite common for kundalini yoga to temporarily accentuate the
sex drive. This period requires extra discipline. Finally, kundalini yoga is closely
associated with tantrism and sex is often used in conjunction with tantric practice.
Where sex is used there is of course the opportunity for misuse or abuse.
If
my kundalini is awakened will I need to change my lifestyle?
It's hard to have your cake and
eat it too. If you awaken kundalini in order to change and enrich your life it's
reasonable to expect you may need to change your lifestyle as a result. The recommendations
of both classical literature and experience is that sleep and diet will need to
be moderated otherwise severe discomfort may arise. Furthermore without moderating
sexual activity and physical work it will be hard to experience much success with
kundalini. The extent that these elements of your life need to change depends on
the nature of the individual. While genuine mental imbalances arising from kundalini
are rare nearly every kundalini yogin will find periods when one needs to be especially
sensitive to needs for sleep, quiet and diet.
Where
can I learn more?
Here are some references for further
reading. They may not be the easiest books to find but they are currently in print
and are very good in their categories. Note that by definition no reputable book
on kundalini will tell you how to awaken your kundalini. Either by effort or by
shaktipat initiation, practicing kundalini yoga requires the instruction of an experienced
teacher. Some introductory practices for cleansing the channels can be learned from
books.
Good introductory
survey:
White, John (Editor) (1990). Kundalini
- Evolution and Enlightenment. New York: Paragon House.
Classical Works:
Svatmarama (1985). The Hatha Yoga
Pradipika (Swami Muktibodhananda Saraswati, Trans.). (First ed.). Munger, Bihar:
Bihar School of Yoga.
Silburn, L. (1988). Kundalini
- Energy of the Depths (Jacques Gontier, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of
New York.
Contemporary
Kundalini Yogins:
Chetanananda, S. (1991). Dynamic
Stillness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Rudra Press.
Muktananda, Swami (1989b). From the Finite to the Infinite (First ed.). Volumes
I &II, South Fallsburg, NY: Siddha Yoga Dham of America Foundation.
Tirtha, Swami Vishnu (1980b). Devatma Shakti (Fifth ed.). Rishikesh: Yoga Shri Peeth
Trust.
Back
|